ABOUT LEGAL MAGIC – The entire legal industry, and our society is made up of words. These words have fluid meanings, and that fluidity is used as magic to hook you into presumptions – presuming that you know what the words are supposed to mean. Presuming that you’re supposed to do what’s asked, without question or alteration from the course that everyone else takes… (You’re still allowed to be an individual)
Let’s imagine that refusing to vaccinate yourself or a child is or becomes a criminal act…
When you go to the doctor, are you required by law to disclose ANYTHING? Well, NO. You aren’t required to disclose anything there. This is why, when doctors started putting questions about having a gun in the home, there was no requirement to answer it. It’s a private matter, and doesn’t affect the ability of the doctor to practice medicine (although they’d argue differently).
Well, if you disclose that you HAVEN’T been vaccinated by your own choice, then the doctor is going to act in an adversarial manner to your choice, and if you are allegedly committing a criminal act, then you have the right to avoid self-incrimination.
I REPEAT: THERE IS NO LEGAL DUTY TO DISCLOSE THIS INFORMATION TO YOUR DOCTOR. And, THERE IS NO DUTY TO INCRIMINATE YOURSELF.
WARNING: Your doctor could refuse to treat you if you refuse to disclose this information, but doing so, if it is criminal to not be vaccinated, would mean that the Doctor is refusing to treat you based on you demanding civil rights (specifically the right of the 5th Amendment to not testify against yourself). If the Doctor refuses to treat you based on your exercising your 5th Amendment right, well, that doctor doesn’t have malpractice insurance that covers that, very likely, and that Doctor could be incurring PERSONAL liability.
That’s a civil rights lawsuit, at the very least. And that lawsuit needs to happen, and here’s hoping it doesn’t require the death of a patient (and an additional wrongful death claim – or murder charge) on top of it.
(If it’s a doctor you’ve used for years, this may be moot, because they may already know the answer).
But if you’re visiting the ER, or a new doctor or any other setting that asks?
YOU ARE WELL WITHIN YOUR RIGHTS TO REFUSE TO ANSWER BASED ON THE 5TH AMENDMENT. (Yes, Anti-Vaxxers have rights also, BEYOTCH.)
THIS ENTIRE ARTICLE is absent intent as legal advice, and is presented as educational, informational, and entertaining.
With that disclaimer, I’m right.