“Scared or Confused” boys…

In the ongoing saga of Faye Ku, who is alleged to be the abductor of her own children, there is more to the story… I would say “there is more to this story than meets the eye,” but that is EXACTLY where the more in this story meets.

National Center for Missing and Exploited Children posted a video showing who I presume to be the Cooks and some scenes of the boys in pictures. (I say “presume”, because I don’t know David or Helen Cook, but I’ve seen the people on this video in stories, and they appear to be David and Helen Cook, if reported stories are accurate.)

In the video, Helen Cook’s eyes stay directly ahead when David Cook says the word “happy.” But, when David Cook says “scared or confused”, Helen Cook’s eyes (@ 30 seconds-ish) darts TWICE to the upper right of the screen.

Here is an NLP eye movement chart. It shows a predictable pattern of response for certain events or triggers:

NLP Eye patterns

The upper right movement that Helen Cook demonstrates twice, is related with Visual Recall in NLP, or “Images from memory.”

It should be pointed out very clearly that this is NOT the same as Visual Construct, or “made up images.” (Which would be the upper right of the screen)

It would appear that the words “scared or confused” triggered actual memories of times when the boys were “scared or confused”. Maybe more than one memory, because her eyes give this pattern twice. (It definitely seems to be a strong trigger.)

This is disturbing that they are working with police and “law enforcement” and these people are trained to interrogate and watch eye patterns, and yet no one caught this.

Here is my post on the original video that the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children posted:

Screenshot (59)[NOTE: My original blog indicated my belief that National Center for Missing and Exploited Children pulled their video. This was probably an errant belief on my part, because the link I had posted omitted one letter of the link (url) of the original video.]

Still, I have posted it here just in case.


per fair use, journalistic purposes, and investigation purposes.

Maybe Faye Ku removed the boys (with or without legal approval) from a situation in which they were “scared or confused.”

Seems like a legitimate conclusion.

[Here is a link to the original video:


A New Folk Heroine… Faye Ku

I “met” Faye Ku (Which, in this case is ironically somewhat idem sonans with “Fuck You”) online, on facebook. I liked her wit, her authenticity and willingness to exist outside of what was expected.

Faye Ku, my new folk heroine.

Faye Ku, my new folk heroine.

I recently learned that she was on a wanted persons list. It is alleged that she kidnapped her own sons (Sage Cook and Isaac Cook) from their father, who has legal custody (at least on paper) of the boys.

Faye is gone… I was shocked, because I felt like I knew her.

In my walk, I’ve seen enough things to know that most of what is presented in the media is the exact opposite behind the scenes.

This case appears to be a bitter story of conformity and normalcy versus individuality and courage.

From the several articles and stories online that are done by news agencies, this one really set things in a much clearer light for me.

BELLEVUE FATHER PLEADS FOR RETURN OF SONS. In this article, David Cook, probably of Bellevue, Washington, and reported to be Harvard educated, says of Faye Ku “She doesn’t always have the best decision-making skills.” I got a chuckle out of this comment, because it is self-disparaging to Cook, if applied to her “decision-making” when hooking up with him.

But what really angered me, what set me against the Cooks, and turned me to the visualization that Faye Ku is a folk heroine is this article: MISSING BROTHERS LEAVE VOID.

QUOTE from the above linked article:
During David Cook’s divorce with the boys’ mother, Faye Ku, education had been a point of contention. As a Harvard graduate, Cook valued traditional schooling. Ku, meanwhile, was a proponent of ‘unschooling.’ (emphasis added)

Unschooling is reportedly a method of self-directed homeschooling that puts the drive and responsibility for learning in the hands of the child, according to Home Education Magazine. It was one of many intense views Ku holds, David said; she also believes vaccinations cause diseases.”

Without going into the validity or invalidity of her beliefs, I want to stay clear on the fact that the WORST thing they could launch in her direction (other than the alleged absconding and kidnapping of her own sons) is that she believes in “unschooling” and is alleged to believe that vaccines cause diseases. (Anti-vax)

Instead of coming out publicly and pointing to an instance where Ku may have been alleged to bring harm to the boys, they choose to reveal that she’s an unschooler and anti-vaccine. WTF?

So, being an individual, and a non-conformist must be really offensive to this “Hahvahd” edumacated guy, David Cook.

Let’s just label this story for what it appears to be:  “CONformity” against “Individuality.”
This undeniable attempt to demonize her simply for her individuality and her power of choice is very relevant in defining the mindset and psychopathic appearance that this gives the father.
It is just my opinion, but damn, this jab at her daring to have an opinion that is different on vaccines and schooling is really first-grade bullying. And this guy went to “Hahvahd”. That must make him the Yod in the YHVH.
One friend said, in response to Cook’s revelations about Ku:If he [Cook] hoped to garner sympathy, he shouldn’t have made his contempt for her so crystal clear.

Here’s what I know. Love is allowance. Love is without fear, hate, control, ownership, demand for a specific outcome, or harm to any party. And while the Cooks may feel harmed, I’d bet my left nut that Faye Ku LOVES her sons. What really harms a child, or even an adult, is to remove their power of choice. To use this in a way that denys or belittles true love is an egregious evil. LOVE desires connection. LOVE wants intimacy without judgment.

Without knowing anything about the case, I’d bet that “Hahvahd” was lawyered up, and Faye got the shaft in the custody hearings. And, I’d bet that Faye has more courage in one hair follicle than “Hahvahd” has on the presumed silver spoon up his ass.

Fuck You, “Hahvahd.” I encourage Faye Ku (wherever she may be) to run like Forrest Gump, and may you never see them again, until your children can express how they really feel about this.

There is no justice in the “justice system”, and yet, it seems, for however long it may last, that you just got served.

In my book, Faye Ku is a Folk HEROINE!

FACEBOOK CENSORSHIP “The science is completely clear”… or not.

Fuckfreespeech - Copy

A while back, Mark Zuckerberg came out as pro-vax, claiming that “The science is completely clear: vaccinations work and are important for the health of everyone in our community.”  The FACT is that “science” that cannot withstand full liability is bullshit science. If the science is completely clear, why not make the manufacturers completely liable for any injury that their products cause? IF, as the pro-vax movement claims, vaccines do not cause injury, then why would the manufacturers need the NCVIA to shield them from liability?

Pro-vaxxers came out with a counter to anti-vax that was something to the effect of “Since other people have brakes on their cars (vaccines for their kids is inferred), I’m going to take the brakes off of my car.” This preposterous knee-jerk response is something similar to Mark’s claim above that the “science is completely clear.” The only thing clear about science is that it is never completely clear.

One need only to look at the drugs approved, and then disapproved by the FDA to make this fact irrefutable. SCIENCE must evolve. Those brakes that were asbestos? Remember those? Well, it’s NOT okay for me to be required to risk my child getting vaccine injured so you can believe that your child has immunity.

SCIENCE should be fair. In other words, if science is legitimate, it should be able to be attacked from every angle and withstand the attacks and still remain solid and absolute. Vaccine science is far from this. Vaccine manufacturers are the only ones with “herd immunity.” And the profits tell the story.

India CEO of Serum Institute is reported to have purchased this home just recently:


Here is a very disturbing obverse to the “success” of this company, and the other vaccine manufacturers.


As irony would have it, I created, and was then banned for a period of time from facebook for creating this meme:

tumblr_njs6jm3fGh1r093ofo1_1280Mark Zuckerberg, and his paid minions, are effectively putting their hands over the mouths of anti-vaxxers, many of whom are of such a belief system BECAUSE they have first-hand experience with adverse effects, including autism, seizures, severe health depression, and even death. These children, and their injuries and deaths are of no seeming concern to Zuckerberg and facebook, because the money is elsewhere.

The vaccine manufacturers are afraid to expose themselves to full liability for things like this:

10363489_736327899777614_5516599856417827508_nThe sick part of this is that vaccines seem to cause schizophrenia in doctors:

SchizophreniaWhy would doctors, who KNOW that every other thing they prescribe has side effects, suddenly believe that vaccines are without the possibility of causing harm? This seems to be largely the case. This author has had a severe reaction to the Tdap vaccine, and when I went back to the doctor that administered it, she acted as if she had never seen an adverse reaction before. She denied it to hell and back that it was related to the vaccine.

Why are they so afraid of full liability, if their “science” is so “completely clear”, as Zuckerberg puts it?

Now, they are censoring information posts, saying:

12002795_10153590266340930_9090407017287885651_nThis was an attempt to post a video link to youtube that contained information on vaccines and how the “science” is compromised.

Here is that video, for those who don’t appreciate censorship:

Here’s a message from someone that attempted to like a post that was quickly deleted by facebook in censorship:

12002034_1039696479387899_5486673819262204195_nLet me be really clear. Mark Zuckerberg is a PUNK. Because the above message demands that the reader “understands” Facebook Community Standards. I’ve written and asked NUMEROUS times for a glossary that clearly defines the meanings of the words used in the Facebook Community Standards, only to hear the sound of crickets chirping. They don’t want you to understand the standards, because they don’t have a set meaning for the standards. Which means, they can bully you, censor you, and even eliminate you without any due process, or freedom of speech being a part of the process.

Punks say “DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME?!?” while being threatening, just to posture you into submission. This is the act of a bully, a punk, and someone who demands, but probably never has any true respect given to them.

You can learn the truth about vaccines, but just like the double standard of allowing men’s nipples, and banning women’s nipples and breastfeeding shots, facebook doesn’t care about free speech. CONTROL is where the money grows.

The science of vaccine is as completely clear, as the facebook terms, conditions, and community standards. They can’t explain them, because it would lock them into a position. So, they just bully whomever they wish, and call it another business day.

Anguish as a language

The heated crucible contains the tears of years of fears I’ve faced,
Enough nauseating terror for fifty men, I face again, again, again.
And through this all I’ve tasked myself to ask the reason why a lie is so easily sold to those willing to hold illusion as a mask, and bask therein as if the truth were theirs.

JV~ 8-17-15

Love or Money

I can hear the gasps among my new friends when we disclosed that we are nomadic, and especially that we depend on the kindness of strangers (panhandling) in between gigs to get by.

I just don’t fit into the standard box. (I’m too big.)

I am an exceptional magician, and yet, most everyone seems content with status quo (non-magic/clever illusion).

So, I get to experience the anguish of survival, in a world that measures success by money. Love is nowhere to be found on that scale. (Love is not control.)

I also get to experience things like another family of seven that stopped at the rest stop we were in, and I walked over to strike up a casual conversation, and he invited me to a puff of ganja, and gave me some ganja to boot. And, as we talked he validated our lifestyle, expressing his lament that he couldn’t do it.

“Security is bullshit, and I have bills up to here (motioning over his head). You made the right choice to live free. I wish I could do it.”

And several of these people have transmuted money into LOVE, by giving without judgment, and perhaps a sparkle of envy in their eyes…

To a T

Spontaneous sweetness

Soul’s reply

It calls to me

A tear I cry

A tear of thanks

For one who dares

To break the ranks

To look, to share

A place that love and passion meet

A place where love makes fear retreat

A place so rich, yet without price

The beauty found within your eyes.

~JV 7-11-15

Why I’m Not a “Life Coach”

Someone asked me last night why I’m not a “life coach.” I’ve been asked this before, and even though I’m a maven that collects information, a connector, and a salesman, I still don’t wrap these all up in a package and sell them to others.


Well, the current system is that the more you make, the more valuable you are. I remember talking to a money making coach that immediately started scolding me before fully assessing the situation. He was geared to one thing. MAKING MORE MONEY. Hell, see for yourself at Mark Allen Grainger’s site. He told me I was “out of integrity” because I couldn’t pay him for his advice (a friend had told me to call him), and all the while, his entire life/business is structured around making more money off of people who want to make more money.

WHERE is the goddamn love? Love is without fear, hate, control, ownership, demand for a specific outcome (judgment) or harm to any party.

I want to love. And, having had everything material taken from me in 2005, I saw that, to society, money is control. We are the ONLY species that pays to live on this planet. Bankers have taken effective control of the world system by equating your power to thrive to a piece of paper

And thus, I refuse to put together a “package” of “life coaching” to sell. I would consider it a non-love venture, because love is not control.

Relationship is mutual reward. And while I could structure a relationship that has mutual reward in the way of exchange, I choose not to insert control into that scenario. What I do, is much more true to me. I share freely. I’ve always seen that it comes back around somehow.

As society is structured, I walk a poverty line. As love is structured, however, I walk in extraordinary wealth.

Our cover picture says it all. This is my turmoil. How to live in a free way without selling my soul.

11312720_1455294908103515_5190585755247252801_oIn love, JV