See past the surface

The meeting occurred for only five minutes. It turned out to be a meeting of souls. I was in a seminar, and the most outrageous character walked in. Everyone was awed. I was intrigued. I usually hate what I see when reading past what an outward persona is projecting. This man, who had walked many miles of treacherous paths to get to our meeting, projected that he dare not be approached haphazardly. He was loud, appeared to be very offensive, although I found myself chuckling at his delivery of word magic.

What I saw, in that five minutes, only drew me into the connection irresistibly, was a soft and pure heart that hid behind this boisterous, and calculatedly incorrigible exterior.

At a later time, the two of us were sitting in a restaurant, and he made a paper rose out of a napkin, and gave it to our waitress. I don’t remember how it came out, but he revealed that his dad “beat him”, and at this instant, I saw a little boy sitting in front of me. The compassionate core of my being wanted to hold him and cry with him. But this man was without the ability to be in a space of vulnerability, least of all with me. I told him that I saw this side of him, and I think it shook him, but he didn’t approach similar ground of allowance to discuss it further, so I yielded to his choice.

I never lost the image. I allowed him to be loud, over-the-top, and even violently angry (without harming anyone, to my observance), and yet from that point on, I only saw that little boy that didn’t know unconditional love as a core gift. I gave it to him anyway, in my own way of allowance.

Water goes under the bridge. People arrive, and they leave our lives, and what is left behind is our experience. This man, my teacher, had and has a pure heart, surrounded with glued together and broken shell. (Perhaps just like you, the reader.) I am honored to have walked with him a mile or more.

Last night I dreamed a dream that he was in. It made me realize the value of having spent quality time with him. Most everything is a benefit, if it is observed to be.

How to do magic

I’ve led an interesting life. Four years ago, I had structured, and was managing assets for several professionals who wanted total privacy. One of them had intent to obtain a used Mercedes Benz, and I had put it into trust for him. He also didn’t want his name on the insurance policy.

One of my past experiences was to have a short-lived licensee status as a Property and Casualty (Automobile/Homeowners) insurance agent. I learned the basic rules and workarounds that made unusual situations smoother. I carried this information forward, even though I hated selling insurance almost as much as eating a sardine and banana sandwich.

North Carolina (where this occurred) has an insurance policy for underwriters to get an agreement signed before issuing a policy that is an agreement of the policy holder to inform the insurance underwriter of “any additional drivers” of the property being insured.

The beneficiary wanted total privacy, and didn’t want to be listed on the insurance either.

So, I set up the personal property trust, and structured it so that (a) the Trust and the Trustee (me, in this case) was authorized to purchase insurance for the property (vehicle) and add the trust as an additional named insured, and (b) I wrote a paragraph that eliminated and nullified any duty to notify the insurance underwriter of any additional drivers or anyone enjoying beneficial use of the property, any law or policy notwithstanding. I matched this with the confidentiality clause in the Trust, to ensure that I was bound to keep this beneficiary private, and yet my intent was to insure the property even though he would be an “unknown” driver on the policy.

In legalese, the term “driver” is fluid, and includes the Trust, because the Trust is an additional named insured on the policy. Further, it would follow that the Trust, and the parties to the trust are one and the same in this setting of insuring the vehicle to cover the Trust’s property, and the use of that property as authorized by the Trust.

The trust was signed, and when I set up insurance on the vehicle, I did so as Trustee of the trust. I added the Trust as an additional named insured on the policy. Then I signed the paperwork this way: “Principally and perpetually subject to the terms of ***** Trust, without waiver, by Trustee” and then I signed my name afterwards. The use of a disclaimer changes the terms of the signature. For more information, research “restricted endorsement”

The insurance company (underwriter) issued the policy, even after being given notice that the agreement was subject to the terms of the Trust, and they NEVER asked to see the trust. Their agreement couldn’t have been more evidenced.

Six months later, late one night, the beneficiary hit a deer and totaled the Mercedes-Benz. I got a copy of the police report emailed to me, and I (as Trustee) initiated an insurance claim on behalf of the Trust.

I had an adjuster call me and say “We are not going to cover this accident, because the person listed on the accident report is not a named driver on this policy.”

I told her “I’m going to send you a copy of the original paperwork I signed, and I’m going to paste in a provision from the Trust.” I sent her my copy of the original signed paperwork (so she would be clear that I had a record of the transaction, as effected) and then I pasted in the paragraph that eliminated any duty of the Trust to inform the underwriter of any beneficiary or additional drivers (users) of the property. I also reminded her that the Trustee (I) was a named insured, and the Trust was an additional named insured, and the claim had been initiated in the name of the Trust.

She called me back shortly and said “We’re going to cover this.” And, it was covered fully.

That, my dear reader, is the power of words, and a clear example of how to use them in a way much mightier than the sword.

I’ve told this story several times recently, so I wanted to put it in writing so that you could enjoy it also. From time to time, I’ve helped people use some unorthodox, but entirely legal methods to keep peaceful existence. This is one of those experiences.

The Difference Between “Oh” and “OMFG”…

The orgasm of a woman is tied to her central nervous system. If she accomplishes orgasm, she has to be able to go to a degree of what I call “no mind” space. (Zero Point energy, creative space, still mind, are all common replacements for this uninterrupted and free space.)

To achieve oneness with her body in a way that is truly mind-blowing is to go totally into no mind space, or totally out of her fucking mind. (OMFG) This means totally losing her fear of everything distracting.

If the following things are in play, there is almost zero chance that a woman can experience an “OMG” orgasm:

* The kids are If the kids are around, a concern, or there is a risk that they will become a concern
* Her partner is in a moody or self-absorbed space
* Her partner is focused only on their own pleasure
* Her partner is easily offended or defensive when discussion of how to please her comes up
* She is fearful of her partner’s perception of her body, reaction, or response
* She is angry at, or holds long term bitterness toward her partner for uncommunicated issues
* An overwhelming emotional issue is holding her captive (boss is threatening or sexually harassing, or other emotional prison, such as a former rape that hasn’t been fully processed mentally)

This is only a partial list. Plainly, anything that can cause a woman to be anxious, can keep her from going into the no-mind space. The sympathetic nervous system fear response of a woman is “tend and befriend”, (or I can – it is my duty to – fix this). When a woman believes that there is something that she has a duty to fix or “make okay”, it is highly probable that she will REMAIN in sympathetic nervous system fear response (tend and befriend) because this is programmed response. It’s automatic and involuntary.

The list above contains a lot of the reasons that women fake orgasms, because the alternative – talking to their partner – is usually not productive. The receiver is frustrated, and the giver will feel ego-challenged. So, it’s easier to fake it. (I’m neither judging, nor supporting that.)

So, how do you, as a woman get past this tend and befriend, and get to the parasympathetic place of “OMG” (out of your mind) orgasms? The path through or around fear must be taken. Going around fear leaves it in place, to haunt again, but going through it faces, acknowledges the fear, and then sees it fall away, to leave the door open to bliss.

For the trip through fear, I’m a tour guide.

If You’re Going To Be Stupid, Be Smart About It…

This morning, the following picture was posted on Facebook along with an explanation that their child is now “okay”.

image

Along with this was an explanation that the nurse said it was not from the vaccine, and that apparently the boy is “fine” now.

Listen. I am anti-vax. I am NOT anti parent or anti child.  I believe you and your family should have a happy existence. But if you are pro-vax, just because is the popular thing to do and you don’t want to resist, I am betting that there is a small doubt in the back of your mind. “What if”…

What if this was your son or daughter?

The time to think about this is now, before you go into the doctors office. When you go into a panic state, and your adrenaline kicks in, you can’t think clearly for at least 30 minutes afterwards. So if you prepare before you go in, and rehearse your actions, then you will know what to do and how to take care of this situation.

With the clear disclaimer that I am NOT authorized to give you legal advice, let me tell you what I would do before going into a doctors office to have my child vaccinated for anything.

First, I would check the laws in my state for recording conversations. Look up ” one party consent states”. If the state is a one party consent state, that means one party to the conversation has to know about the recording. If I have a party to the conversation, & I know about it, then it’s legal. To be candid, I don’t believe I’m giving up my right to make a record of the events, so if my state is not on the list, I’m probably going to record it anyway. In either case I would do it secretly.

A small digital recorder in a shirt pocket purse or phone case works well but should be tested beforehand to make sure but the microphone position is forward, towards the conversation, and the conversation can easily be picked up by the microphone with clarity.

I would always record interactions with the medical industry. The medical industry is owned and controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, also known as the US Drug Cartel. They are without conscience.

As demonstrated by the above presentation, members of the medical community will boldly lie to to your face to protect their job. I have experienced this first-hand with a vaccine injury.

On top of audio recording the visit, I would also immediately begin to take pictures of any and all changes that I believe are detrimental to the health and/or safety of my child.

As terrifying as it may sound, I would next call two different agencies. First I would dial 9-1-1, and ask for an ambulance to be dispatched. I would state that I am in fear for my child’s life because of the actions of the doctors office. I would make sure to get this on the 911 recording. I believe it is very important to establish that I believe harm has occurred and I do not feel safe any longer in the environment that was alleged to be there for my protection. I would repeat the same statement at the next  number I called.

The next agency I would call is the county health department. I would restate the above phrase about fearing for the safety of my child, inform them that an ambulance is on the way, and I would ask them to respond immediately.

I would refuse to allow the doctors office further access to my child based on this one observation. A medical professional that is deemed competent enough to administer a vaccine, yet is incompetent to diagnose injury from that vaccine, is a perceived an actual threat to the safety of my child.

Document the events.

If you’re going to be stupid, at least be smart about it.

“Scared or Confused” boys…

In the ongoing saga of Faye Ku, who is alleged to be the abductor of her own children, there is more to the story… I would say “there is more to this story than meets the eye,” but that is EXACTLY where the more in this story meets.

National Center for Missing and Exploited Children posted a video showing who I presume to be the Cooks and some scenes of the boys in pictures. (I say “presume”, because I don’t know David or Helen Cook, but I’ve seen the people on this video in stories, and they appear to be David and Helen Cook, if reported stories are accurate.)

In the video, Helen Cook’s eyes stay directly ahead when David Cook says the word “happy.” But, when David Cook says “scared or confused”, Helen Cook’s eyes (@ 30 seconds-ish) darts TWICE to the upper right of the screen.

Here is an NLP eye movement chart. It shows a predictable pattern of response for certain events or triggers:

NLP Eye patterns

The upper right movement that Helen Cook demonstrates twice, is related with Visual Recall in NLP, or “Images from memory.”

It should be pointed out very clearly that this is NOT the same as Visual Construct, or “made up images.” (Which would be the upper right of the screen)

It would appear that the words “scared or confused” triggered actual memories of times when the boys were “scared or confused”. Maybe more than one memory, because her eyes give this pattern twice. (It definitely seems to be a strong trigger.)

This is disturbing that they are working with police and “law enforcement” and these people are trained to interrogate and watch eye patterns, and yet no one caught this.

Here is my post on the original video that the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children posted:

Screenshot (59)[NOTE: My original blog indicated my belief that National Center for Missing and Exploited Children pulled their video. This was probably an errant belief on my part, because the link I had posted omitted one letter of the link (url) of the original video.]

Still, I have posted it here just in case.

SCARED or CONFUSED boys?

per fair use, journalistic purposes, and investigation purposes.

Maybe Faye Ku removed the boys (with or without legal approval) from a situation in which they were “scared or confused.”

Seems like a legitimate conclusion.

[Here is a link to the original video:

]

A New Folk Heroine… Faye Ku

I “met” Faye Ku (Which, in this case is ironically somewhat idem sonans with “Fuck You”) online, on facebook. I liked her wit, her authenticity and willingness to exist outside of what was expected.

Faye Ku, my new folk heroine.

Faye Ku, my new folk heroine.

I recently learned that she was on a wanted persons list. It is alleged that she kidnapped her own sons (Sage Cook and Isaac Cook) from their father, who has legal custody (at least on paper) of the boys.

Faye is gone… I was shocked, because I felt like I knew her.

In my walk, I’ve seen enough things to know that most of what is presented in the media is the exact opposite behind the scenes.

This case appears to be a bitter story of conformity and normalcy versus individuality and courage.

From the several articles and stories online that are done by news agencies, this one really set things in a much clearer light for me.

BELLEVUE FATHER PLEADS FOR RETURN OF SONS. In this article, David Cook, probably of Bellevue, Washington, and reported to be Harvard educated, says of Faye Ku “She doesn’t always have the best decision-making skills.” I got a chuckle out of this comment, because it is self-disparaging to Cook, if applied to her “decision-making” when hooking up with him.

But what really angered me, what set me against the Cooks, and turned me to the visualization that Faye Ku is a folk heroine is this article: MISSING BROTHERS LEAVE VOID.

QUOTE from the above linked article:
During David Cook’s divorce with the boys’ mother, Faye Ku, education had been a point of contention. As a Harvard graduate, Cook valued traditional schooling. Ku, meanwhile, was a proponent of ‘unschooling.’ (emphasis added)

Unschooling is reportedly a method of self-directed homeschooling that puts the drive and responsibility for learning in the hands of the child, according to Home Education Magazine. It was one of many intense views Ku holds, David said; she also believes vaccinations cause diseases.”

Without going into the validity or invalidity of her beliefs, I want to stay clear on the fact that the WORST thing they could launch in her direction (other than the alleged absconding and kidnapping of her own sons) is that she believes in “unschooling” and is alleged to believe that vaccines cause diseases. (Anti-vax)

Instead of coming out publicly and pointing to an instance where Ku may have been alleged to bring harm to the boys, they choose to reveal that she’s an unschooler and anti-vaccine. WTF?

So, being an individual, and a non-conformist must be really offensive to this “Hahvahd” edumacated guy, David Cook.

Let’s just label this story for what it appears to be:  “CONformity” against “Individuality.”
This undeniable attempt to demonize her simply for her individuality and her power of choice is very relevant in defining the mindset and psychopathic appearance that this gives the father.
It is just my opinion, but damn, this jab at her daring to have an opinion that is different on vaccines and schooling is really first-grade bullying. And this guy went to “Hahvahd”. That must make him the Yod in the YHVH.
One friend said, in response to Cook’s revelations about Ku:If he [Cook] hoped to garner sympathy, he shouldn’t have made his contempt for her so crystal clear.

Here’s what I know. Love is allowance. Love is without fear, hate, control, ownership, demand for a specific outcome, or harm to any party. And while the Cooks may feel harmed, I’d bet my left nut that Faye Ku LOVES her sons. What really harms a child, or even an adult, is to remove their power of choice. To use this in a way that denys or belittles true love is an egregious evil. LOVE desires connection. LOVE wants intimacy without judgment.

Without knowing anything about the case, I’d bet that “Hahvahd” was lawyered up, and Faye got the shaft in the custody hearings. And, I’d bet that Faye has more courage in one hair follicle than “Hahvahd” has on the presumed silver spoon up his ass.

Fuck You, “Hahvahd.” I encourage Faye Ku (wherever she may be) to run like Forrest Gump, and may you never see them again, until your children can express how they really feel about this.

There is no justice in the “justice system”, and yet, it seems, for however long it may last, that you just got served.

In my book, Faye Ku is a Folk HEROINE!

FACEBOOK CENSORSHIP “The science is completely clear”… or not.

Fuckfreespeech - Copy

A while back, Mark Zuckerberg came out as pro-vax, claiming that “The science is completely clear: vaccinations work and are important for the health of everyone in our community.”  The FACT is that “science” that cannot withstand full liability is bullshit science. If the science is completely clear, why not make the manufacturers completely liable for any injury that their products cause? IF, as the pro-vax movement claims, vaccines do not cause injury, then why would the manufacturers need the NCVIA to shield them from liability?

Pro-vaxxers came out with a counter to anti-vax that was something to the effect of “Since other people have brakes on their cars (vaccines for their kids is inferred), I’m going to take the brakes off of my car.” This preposterous knee-jerk response is something similar to Mark’s claim above that the “science is completely clear.” The only thing clear about science is that it is never completely clear.

One need only to look at the drugs approved, and then disapproved by the FDA to make this fact irrefutable. SCIENCE must evolve. Those brakes that were asbestos? Remember those? Well, it’s NOT okay for me to be required to risk my child getting vaccine injured so you can believe that your child has immunity.

SCIENCE should be fair. In other words, if science is legitimate, it should be able to be attacked from every angle and withstand the attacks and still remain solid and absolute. Vaccine science is far from this. Vaccine manufacturers are the only ones with “herd immunity.” And the profits tell the story.

India CEO of Serum Institute is reported to have purchased this home just recently:

12032974_156050321403983_2854586052880450439_n

Here is a very disturbing obverse to the “success” of this company, and the other vaccine manufacturers.

KNOW THE RISK. (WARNING: DISTURBING VACCINE INJURY STORIES AND IMAGES)

As irony would have it, I created, and was then banned for a period of time from facebook for creating this meme:

tumblr_njs6jm3fGh1r093ofo1_1280Mark Zuckerberg, and his paid minions, are effectively putting their hands over the mouths of anti-vaxxers, many of whom are of such a belief system BECAUSE they have first-hand experience with adverse effects, including autism, seizures, severe health depression, and even death. These children, and their injuries and deaths are of no seeming concern to Zuckerberg and facebook, because the money is elsewhere.

The vaccine manufacturers are afraid to expose themselves to full liability for things like this:

10363489_736327899777614_5516599856417827508_nThe sick part of this is that vaccines seem to cause schizophrenia in doctors:

SchizophreniaWhy would doctors, who KNOW that every other thing they prescribe has side effects, suddenly believe that vaccines are without the possibility of causing harm? This seems to be largely the case. This author has had a severe reaction to the Tdap vaccine, and when I went back to the doctor that administered it, she acted as if she had never seen an adverse reaction before. She denied it to hell and back that it was related to the vaccine.

Why are they so afraid of full liability, if their “science” is so “completely clear”, as Zuckerberg puts it?

Now, they are censoring information posts, saying:

12002795_10153590266340930_9090407017287885651_nThis was an attempt to post a video link to youtube that contained information on vaccines and how the “science” is compromised.

Here is that video, for those who don’t appreciate censorship:

http://youtu.be/jEvQLNg3OJM
Here’s a message from someone that attempted to like a post that was quickly deleted by facebook in censorship:

12002034_1039696479387899_5486673819262204195_nLet me be really clear. Mark Zuckerberg is a PUNK. Because the above message demands that the reader “understands” Facebook Community Standards. I’ve written and asked NUMEROUS times for a glossary that clearly defines the meanings of the words used in the Facebook Community Standards, only to hear the sound of crickets chirping. They don’t want you to understand the standards, because they don’t have a set meaning for the standards. Which means, they can bully you, censor you, and even eliminate you without any due process, or freedom of speech being a part of the process.

Punks say “DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME?!?” while being threatening, just to posture you into submission. This is the act of a bully, a punk, and someone who demands, but probably never has any true respect given to them.

You can learn the truth about vaccines, but just like the double standard of allowing men’s nipples, and banning women’s nipples and breastfeeding shots, facebook doesn’t care about free speech. CONTROL is where the money grows.

The science of vaccine is as completely clear, as the facebook terms, conditions, and community standards. They can’t explain them, because it would lock them into a position. So, they just bully whomever they wish, and call it another business day.