Screen Shot 2014-07-22 at 11.47.21 PM


What is a Masculinist?

Dunno. There. I admitted that I have no fucking clue what a “Masculinist” is, and I invented the word. I just kept seeing that many of the occurrences of the word “feminist” seemed to express (or reveal) some underlying anger, bitterness, or hatred towards men.

So, why did I invent the word? Because I’m a guy who:

  • Loves women
  • Has no desire to control women
  • Has no desire to own any woman
  • Realizes that women are magical beings
  • Realizes that women have been given a bad rap because of societal shaming them into repression with sexuality issues (slut shaming)
  • Realizes that women don’t complete men
  • Realizes that men don’t complete women
  • Realizes that the woman who owns her power is sexy
  • Realizes that a woman who is looking for “the one” who will complete her is unaware that she can be complete within herself
  • Realizes that a woman who is already complete in herself, and self-empowered is a woman who is extremely dangerous (to societal norms), and thus I applaud her

This is not a complete list. But I created the word “Masculinist” because I was going down a friends twitter follower list, and I kept seeing “feminist” pop up on the women’s descriptions. And whatever that means to them is of no concern to me. But I’m a Masculinist, goddammit, and if that twists your nipples, well then, it just twists your nipples…


Avoiding Bullshit At The Hospital

NOTICE: ABSENT INTENT AS LEGAL ADVICE. (However, I’ve used this process for years now, and it really puts their teats in a wringer every time.) 

EMERGENCY… You have to go to the hospital. Ugh.

As one who usually avoids the medical/pharmaceutical industry unless a life-threatening or a severely imminent matter is present, I hate going to the hospital. But, with five children, it’s going to happen sometime.

And regardless of whether it is an injury, or non-stop projectile [fill in the blank] coming out of every hole, sometimes you just need to step back and get a doctor involved. I seriously don’t know how to fix a broken arm…

And when you go in, first, there are questions, questions, and then more questions. And then, the nightmare. FORMS… Forms that need your signature. And when you sign something, the reason is ALWAYS so that a liability is created.


Being a homeschooler, and more specifically an “unschooler,” we have coached our children on how to answer generic (and expected) questions about “what grade are you in,” or “Are you a good student?” (The answer to that is “I’m a good teacher.”)

I NEVER leave a child alone with a medical professional. The reason is that I don’t trust them, and my presence in their establishment is not a sign of trust in anything except the hope that I can have my child treated without being harassed or power-played

So, if a question comes up that may be common to ask, but makes me feel like I’m being interrogated, or I am uncomfortable with, I will verbally steer the conversation away from that, either casually, or just saying “We are here to get a possible broken arm investigated, and her schoolwork [or any other subject matter] is not at issue here.”

I’ve trained people for years on how to deal with “authority”, so I’m really prepared for almost any out-of-the-ordinary event. I used to be fear-struck when anyone would ask questions that may reveal that I was outside of the box.

FORMS (Admission forms or other forms):

This is the main issue that I want to cover here.

Shown are examples from a recent trip to the hospital with my daughter. She was playing, and bent her neck the wrong way, straining it. Her pain was not too severe, and I checked out her peripherals, her hand grip was good, no numbness in any extremity, and her eyes dilated and constricted with changing light. The next morning, however, she had a bit of nausea without any other reasoning. So, I decided to take her in to play it safe.

Here are the forms I altered/novated/disclaimed. The disclaimers I used are very powerful, and really negate any hooks that they are attempting to put in me.

Patient Rights And Responsibilities

Patient Consent

Conditions of Admission and Consent to medical treatment

At the close of the interaction, they produced a Promissory Note for me to sign.


I asked:

“Do I have a legal duty to sign this Promissory Note?” The clerk truthfully answered “No.” (If they had said yes, I could have either asked them to produce the law, or asked them if they were a lawyer and qualified to give me legal advice. – This always produces a noticeable “gulp” in the party attempting to coerce a signature.)

So, I said “Then, I refuse to sign it.” And that was that.

DISCHARGE INSTRUCTIONSThe Emergency Discharge form is really not necessary. They can’t do anything to you if you don’t sign it. They wanted me to sign it with a computer mouse, but I couldn’t add my disclaimers first, so I told them to print it if they wanted me to sign it. When I did the “Absent Joinder,” it was/is because the signature is in a box. Boundary law is important even on documents. If you’ve ever seen a boxed off section marked “Office Use Only”, it  is a section behind a boundary, and it is not for you to go into. This is a clear example of boundary law working on a document.

So, since the signature was/is in a box, “absent joinder” gives conspicuous notice that my intent is elimination of connection with anything outside of the signature box. The signature, therefore, is without power to the rest of the document.

Financial Agreement Disclaimer

On the document that begins with “IV. FINANCIAL AGREEMENT….” I COULD have stricken the entire section, but I really try to avoid fucking with them, because they are really acting in ignorance, and it’s not my job to fix, or educate them. It’s my job to protect my own ass, and I’m actually surprised that I didn’t see a standard carte blanche statement which would have given my consent to any medical procedure or practice that they “deemed” medically necessary. While I didn’t see it, it may have been in there, because this is a rushed procedure. They want their papers signed, and you want your problem attended to, so this is a quick process of disclaiming and moving on. Since this was my daughter that needed medical attention, and not myself, I made it as clean as possible without giving them a damn thing.

[NOTE CONCERNING AUTHORIZATION FOR TREATMENT: Many times, if I can see the section that gives them authority to do anything that they “deem” (not prove) to be medically necessary, I will strike this out, and will write in “ONLY AUTHORIZING INSPECTION OF, AND PRESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT FOR NECK INJURY” (or whatever the ailment is). I’ve seen a set of parents have their child seized by the state of Texas for refusing to do a surgery on their newborn, and this was because they had signed their paperwork without any disclaimers, or novations (changing the document).]

Notice that I also struck out a couple of the key provisions of the paragraph just before the signature on the Financial Agreement paperwork.

I noticed them that all signatures were “without waiver”, meaning that I retained all of my rights. I also noticed them that I was without assumption of any liability (guarantee of payment or any other liability.

Our friends just went to the same hospital, and the hospital tried to get them to sign a BLANK promissory note! This is not only unethical, it is a power play that is just fucked up. And they expect you to sign it. Our friends called me before doing this, and I told them how to avoid signing it, but asked for a picture of it. Here it is. Understand, signing this thing would have entitled the hospital to bill them for $500,000.00 for a simple IV for dehydration.

Blank Promissory Note sanitized


If you want more information on how to do this, or how your signature is what causes you problems, drop me a line by commenting here.





First, a poem:

The Magic of The Woman

Last night I dreamed a dream, a rarity for me.

I gained a long awaited peace through lucid scenery.

I saw that men, of which I’m one, have sought to long repress

The female magic that’s innate, which men do not possess.

The male has, through their physical force, compelled submission sure

Through fear of female magic, which though suppressed, endures.

The ego of the male is but a fearsome ugly beast

But balanced with the female, is a never-ending feast.

The focus on Excalibur, ignores the mighty stone

That held the sword with magic grasp, until ‘twas rightly owned.

And so without the rock of the divine in female form,

Man is but an ego, warring tired and battle worn.

Terrified of the disclosure of their egos exiguous;

Male has compelled female to reduce itself to lust.

While the law cannot be broken, ever so the fact is shown -

That the female OWNS divinity with her true philosopher’s stone.

To devise the purest balance, measure equal yin and yang,

Let the ego wane in balance, reach divinity again.

(c) Jay Vincent

I wrote this poem in 2011, after having exited a patriarchal form of Christianity, in which the woman was told to “submit”. At that time, I knew little of how this dynamic controls the entire world. But I started to study it, because the poem above came to me in revealed meditation.

Looking at the way the world works, observing the mechanics, and asking questions, meditating, waiting for revelation from varied sources, and then repeating the cycle.

And the path I have traveled, from east to west, is explicitly opposed to the masonic path that alleges (without substance) to be towards the light. I have traveled this opposite path to discover that I AM the light. As are you, dear reader. You are without the need of any  brotherhood or fraternity to enlighten you. And this article, while presenting information, is only for consideration. The light that is within you will confirm or deny this information as it pertains to you.

The path from west to east (The alleged path of fraternity-controlled enlightenment) is a path of legerdemain and trickery, because it subjugates the woman, just as its Christian counterpart does. And yet, the secret is hidden in plain sight, even when the feminine is subjected as irrelevant or less than masculine.

Most (not all) religions have some form of symbology that mirrors the following:

The masculine spire (cock) over the feminine bell (vagina)

The masculine spire (cock) over the feminine bell (vagina). Does your church have these sexual symbols on them?

Hiram Abiff, a staple fable of the Masonic fraternal order, really does his work by piercing the feminine symbology.

Hiram Abiff, a staple fable of the Masonic fraternal order, really does his work by piercing the feminine symbology.

And the mathematics of the universe are set aside through sleight of hand here. While the masculine spire rises over the belfry, if the belfry were not there for it to rest upon, if the altar of the church was not there for a podium to sit on, The point of the Compass is used to pierce the breast of the initiate in the masonic lodge, yet the picture above shows that Hiram Abiff is using that same compass to reveal the truths that are hidden in plain sight. WITHOUT the feminine, the masculine is but a spurting cock, an erect edifice without release, without abode, without fertile ground upon which to build his “empire”.

The mathematics of the universe show that the feminine IS the most important piece, AND does most of the work for the final issuance to come forth.

The feminine is the cauldron, adds the egg upon which the sperm acts, housing and nurturing the life created, until that life is also issued forth from her womb. The man, making one act of ejaculation, then lays claim to all of this, and calls it his own, and controls it by relegating it as the weaker vessel. I call BULLSHIT.


The God of the Bible is the YHVH, transliterated Jehovah. There is a Yod, which is masculine, and a Vav, which is feminine. The Bible is suspiciously written in a total masculine framework, where the masculine rules, and the feminine is subjugated to inferior, or ignored. NEVER is God presented in a feminine framework in the Bible. And yet, there is a feminine balance in the YHVH. It’s hidden in plain sight that the deception is there.

Likewise, the work of Hiram Abiff pictured above, piercing the feminine with the compass, and even the sigil of Lucifer, which the masonic is purportedly based upon, contains the feminine markings upon it’s face, in a way that mirrors Hiram Abiff’s feminine table.


[See the yellow feminine sign in the seal above. This is my individual seal.]

And the Luciferian is closely aligned or at least sympathetic with the symbol/personification of Baphomet, who is androgynous, because there is BALANCE of sexual presentation, both the feminine and the masculine.

And while the Luciferian purports to be masculine, there is the feminine symbology of the cauldron/cup/chalice in the sigil of Lucifer. The power of the feminine, while brute forced into silent submission, is clearly evident.

Here is the Baphomet in androgynous presentation.

The androgynous Baphomet

The androgynous Baphomet


The poem at the beginning speaks of the stone that held the sword – Excalibur. In my seal above, the words EHBEN MOSU HABONIM (The Stone Which The Builder’s Rejected) in my mind refers to the feminine that is relegated to silence and second class status.

YOU, dear feminine, are the stone that the builders rejected. You’ve been relegated to SLUT, or WHORE for embracing your sexuality. I’m here to tell you that it’s time to show the world your magic, and believe that your sexuality is yours. It’s time to possess the fullness of your sexuality with FREEDOM while releasing the fear.

It’s time to balance this world out. It’s time to walk into your darkness, that fearful place where you were anchored to abuse, control, shame,  or guilt, and to realize that YOUR light is brighter than those around you telling you that you need them to exist, be whole, or be happy.

It’s time to travel wherever the fuck you want to go, and roar while you are doing it.

Jay Vincent,

Twitter @JVagician

About Being Compelled To Testify In Civil Court…

[Before you start reading, let me assure you that this remedy is for you whether you are a christian or not. I, specifically, am not a christian, but used to claim this status. The fact that is relevant is that the court will ask you to swear in on a BIBLE. So that is THEIR authority. (The same bible that prohibits swearing in James 5:12)]
Romans 3:4 KJV “God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.”

He who claims (or the accuser) has the burden of proof (Legal maxim) – (This is the basis of Innocent Until Proven Guilty)

Testimony requires you to “swear in.” Criminal cases prohibit compulsory testimony, but civil cases are a nasty animal, in that someone can haul your ass into court, and the court can “compel” (force) you to testify against yourself. This RELIEVES the plaintiff of the burden of proof, since they can force you to testify (provide evidence) against yourself. If you don’t comply, the judge can hold you in contempt…

UNLESS, there is a remedy to that bullshit…. And it just so happens, THERE IS…

The Bible that they ask you to swear in on -Is the place where the remedy can be found. And then, CASE LAW affirms your right to use it…

Here’s an excerpt from my FREE e-book COUNTER THESPIANAGE that explains it with illustration:

“ABOUT BEING COMPELLED TO TESTIFY: In civil cases, often, the court is rigged where you are compelled to testify against yourself.

Here is a technique I learned from George Gordon, and I want to pass it along to you. Using this technique, you should NEVER have to testify again!

Imagine that you have been subpoenaed in a civil case to testify:

Plaintiff’s Attorney: I hereby call John Doe as my next witness. You proceed to the stand, and the clerk will say: “put your left hand on the bible, and raise your right hand. Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?”

YOU: “No.”

Judge: “What did you say?”

YOU: “Judge, this bible right here says, in the book of Romans, chapter 3, verse 4, ‘God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.’ And Judge, this verse clearly says that I am a liar, and only God is true. So if God says I am a liar, I cannot, in good conscience, come into this courtroom and attempt to claim otherwise. I am a liar, so my testimony will do you no good.

Now, Judge, United States v. Rylander (460 U.S. 752, 757, 103 S.Ct. 1548, 75 L. Ed. 2d 521 <1983>) shows that a party’s inability to comply with a judicial order constitutes a defense to a charge of civil contempt, and I surely cannot claim to be truthful, when the same bible you are askin me to swear in on says I am a liar, which creates an impossibility for me to swear in, unless, of course, you want to go on record as re-writing the bible with authority to do so.” (This last part is in anticipation of the probable threat from the judge to “hold you in contempt” if you don’t swear in.

The question to respond with, is “What are you going to do, Judge, hold me in contempt for admitting I am a liar and backing it up with the authority YOU have presented???”)

[NOTE: It takes real cajones to stand up to the intimidation level that court is equipped to foist upon you. The thing to remember is that if you ask them questions which require them to explain why you are wrong, and they can’t answer them, they leave you with no remedy. Justice ALWAYS requires a remedy.]

The look on the judge’s face should be priceless, mirroring the look on the face of the lawyer trying to get you to testify against yourself. I find joyful irony in the fact that the Romans 3:4 verse specifically states that you can “overcome” judgment with this technique.

There you go, it’s yours to use, if you choose. They are the ones asking you to swear in on a bible that prohibits swearing, which is a PRIME example of the contradictions of the “law” exposed by this book. (Using their tricks, and their words to destroy their egomaniacal attempts to hoodwink you is called “efficiency.”) By keeping the burden of proof on the one making the claim, and by refusing to assist them in their attempt to hang you, you can win more often and easier.

They are claiming that you have a duty (and are able) to swear in. Using the same bible they present for this to happen on, show the verse, and then ask them to prove that the bible is without authority… Pretty simple. “Either this bible is correct in saying I’m a liar, or you are more powerful than the “god” you claim wrote this bible. Which is it, Judge?”

My third rule is “NEVER argue.”


The Unruly

The Unruly

There is a growing class of people from all walks of life that are “unruly”. Call them Anarchists, Voluntaryists, Rebels, Terrorists, or whatever you want to call them. But I am one of them. And I refuse to be ruled by someone’s concept of “god” or “government” – which are basically both religious fictional constructs.

I’m unruly. Why, you ask? Because I’ve observed that those who say that “God” or “government” are going to get me are immediately silent when I ask them a few questions:

  • Is God/government big enough to handle this himself/itself, or does he/it need you to threaten me first?
  • Is Government subject to their own “laws”?
  • Do I have any rights to be heard on the matter, or does “God/government” demand my obedience without question?
  • If something or someone demands your obedience without question, is this a freedom construct, or a slavery construct?

And all of a sudden, their patriotism, and their religious piety, turns to mush when they realize that they have no substance with which to answer these questions.

And so, I ask you here today:

Are you unruly? Do you believe that individual freedom is YOURS, and YOU make the best choices for you?


Do you deserve to be ruled?

Are YOU the authority in your own life?


Does your “authority” allow your refusal, your dissent, your rebellion, or does your government force your compliance, by threat of lethal violence?

Does your authority respond fully to your questions, or are your questions treated as threats, and violence invoked?

Live. Be Unruly…

Connect with Luck Fawyers on facebook at: